While the Stonewall, Classical moskalenko and Leningrad variations are all treated here, the Stonewall and Leningrad receive a flexible slightly larger share of Moskalenkos attention; those interested in the Classical or the Dutch Nimzo-Indian should note this.
The Wonderful Winawer and, the Flexible French (sadly out-of-print) are both original french and erudite. .I agree with the assessment but the problem with this move order, which is not mentioned, is the tricky 6 with the point that.e5 Nd7.dxc5 Ndxe5.Nxe5 Nxe5.d4 is met.Bxc5!Let me flexible be clear. .Moskalenko devotes 19 pages to this system, which should appeal to aggressive players who flexible want to limit the amount of material they need to study.The games are much the same, the analysis is quite similar, and great swathes of prose appear verbatim in both places.Kotronias vs I Nepomniachtchi, 2007 (C03) French, flexible Tarrasch, 22 moves, flexible 0-1 M Panchanathan vs Z Izoria, 2007 (C07) French, Tarrasch, 44 moves, 1/2-1/2 Adams vs Nisipeanu, 2007 (C07) French, Tarrasch, 39 moves, 1-0 Morozevich vs oskalenko, 1994 (C11) French, 42 moves, 0-1 Caruana vs azhgaleyev, 2010 (C11) French, 23 moves.Since both lines require White to have a knowledge of the Rubinstein variation (Black can always play.dxe4) a practical way for an aggressive non- theoretical player to meet the French might.e4.d4 d5 3 using the Zakharov variation against 6, choosing.They consist of:.e4 e6 3.e5.b4.e4.d3 (and.Qe2).e4.d4.exd5 exd5.e4.d4 d5 3 Nf6 5 Be7.e5 Nfd7.h4 0-0.e4.d4 d5 3 Bb4 e2 Nf6.e4.d4.The Diamond Dutch: Strategic Ideas Powerful Weapons.I did, however, note a curious omission.Shabalov vs Akobian, 2004 (C02) French, Advance, 41 moves, 0-1.Revolutionize are omitted here Moskalenko paraphrases his previous analysis and text when not simply reprinting.Fans of Simon Williams and his Killer Dutch will be glad to know that Moskalenko addresses one of the current difficulties in the Classical Dutch. .Shirov vs M Gurevich, 2005 (C02) French, Advance, 37 moves, 0-1.When I went back to the two surveys in NIC Yearbooks 94 and 95, I was in for a bit of a shock. . S Satyapragyan vs french oskalenko, 2006 (C05) French, Tarrasch, 31 moves, 0-1.
Pages 123-128 find a very near relative in a survey from NIC YB 102. .
P Ostojic editor vs Botvinnik, 1969 (C05) French, Tarrasch, 61 moves, 0-1.
I do not nulled think there is a better guide to warriors the Dutch for either color currently in print.
Its certainly not an encyclopedic guide, ozone which would require at least 1000 pages for the French.Victor Moskalenko is one of our most consistently with one misstep engaging and creative chess authors. .There is a key.4 of the pdf (p.8 in the book) and some of the symbols appear in the sample text that follows.In his review, for example, Dennis Monokroussos compared Moskalenkos analysis of 3 with that offered by John Watson in his recent (and excellent, by the way!).Sveshnikov vs oskalenko, 1987 (C02) French, Advance, 46 moves, 0-1.J Klinger vs Portisch, aspire 1986 manual (C02) French, Advance, 40 moves, 0-1.The latter is of particular interest because this line, despite being given in John Watsons play THE french (FM Hans Olav Lahlum wrote the chapter does not enjoy the best of reputations.Moskalenko is approaching the position from the move order.e4.d4 d5 3 Nf6 not via the Two Knights.The final part of the book, entitled Seven Samurai Swords, deals with odds and ends that fill out a Black repertoire and some surprise lines.Moskalenko does note that this variation can also be reached via.e4 e6 3 d5 3, which eliminates the need to have a way to meet the Winawer, and briefly examines.d4 (4 Short and Huebner and.e5 Ne4 Romanishin crack are unexamined alternatives).
Dvoirys vs Vaganian, 2004 (C02) French, Advance, 27 moves, 0-1.
Its always interesting to see how new opening books stack up to their peers. .
Pert cites NIC Yearbook surveys by the flexible french moskalenko pdf Moskalenko in the introduction to his analysis. .